• Review Instructions:
    The papers submitted to the conference will be subjected to double-blind reviews by a maximum of three (03) reviewers, who will be experts in the corresponding sub-field. Therefore, the names or affiliations of the authors should not be on the first page. The field experts for the reviewing process are selected Nationally (70%) and Internationally (30%).

    Acknowledgments of funding or assistance should also be omitted. Submissions should not contain pointers to supplemental material on the web. When referring to one’s own work, use the third person, rather than the first person. Such information may be added to the final camera-ready version for publication.
  • Quality of Paper:
    Submissions may have up to six (06) pages in double-column. Papers exceeding the specified length and formatting requirements are subject to rejection without review. The final decision of accepting or rejection of your work will be taken by the conference core committee based on the originality of the work. If the committee found plagiarism more than 30% or the paper is not formatted according to conference guidelines or based on the reviewing process, papers will be rejected. The papers will also be checked for the quality of English and will be rejected if it is not up to the mark.

    The final submission must include title; the primary author’s full name, affiliation, and e-mail address; all co-authors’ full names and affiliations; text; and any figures, tables, or diagrams. Note that all papers accepted for publication must be original. The authors need to submit the papers by using Conference Management Toolkit- Microsoft. A copyright form is supposed to be submitted at the final camera-ready submission.

    A Best Paper Award and Best Track Paper Award winners will be announced at the end of sessions.

    Selection of Best paper of the Sessions and Conference:

    1. Nominated Papers for each track will be shortlisted based on the review score (average score of 4.0+ out of 5.0).
    2. On the conference presentation day, the session chairs and members nominated from TPC will together take the decision for the best paper for each track by considering the status/quality of presentations.
    3. Best paper of the conference will be selected among the best session papers by the TPC chair together with session chairs.